Richard, this is still optional, right? (the AST matchers need to control visitation)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:26 AM Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > W00t! That’s awesome Richard! > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Attached patch makes RAV fully data-recursive when visiting statements, > except in cases where the derived class could tell the difference (when it > falls back to a normal recursive walk). The queue representation is > slightly less compact than before: instead of storing a child iterator, we > now store a list of all children. This allows us to handle any Stmt > subclass that we can traverse, not just those ones that finish by > traversing all their children in the usual order. > > Thoughts? > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Craig, Ben via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I'm fine with this approach. How about I leave the file in place, but >> replace the contents with a "using DataRecursiveASTVisitor = >> RecursiveASTVisitor;" and see what breaks? That way I won't need to go >> through a large retrofit. >> >> >> On 11/16/2015 3:28 PM, Richard Smith wrote: >> >> Rather than trying to maintain the horrible duplication between >> DataRecursiveASTVisitor and RecursiveASTVisitor, can we just delete >> DataRecursiveASTVisitor? RecursiveASTVisitor is data-recursive too these >> days (and has a smarter implementation than DataRecursiveASTVisitor's from >> what I can see), but doesn't yet apply data recursion in so many cases. >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis < <akyr...@gmail.com> >> akyr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> LGTM. >>> >>> > On Nov 16, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Ben Craig < <ben.cr...@codeaurora.org> >>> ben.cr...@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > bcraig added a comment. >>> > >>> > Ping. Note that the test is basically a copy / paste job, and the new >>> code in DataRecursiveASTVisitor.h is a very direct translation from the >>> 'regular' RecursiveASTVisitor.h. >>> > >>> > >>> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D14506 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux >> Foundation Collaborative Project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >> > <make-rav-fully-data-recursive.diff> > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits