> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Ben Langmuir via cfe-commits > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Ben Langmuir via cfe-commits >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> This time sending to the right list address. >> >> Likewise =) >> >> > On Nov 13, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Ben Langmuir <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > Hey Richard, >> > >> > After your commit r233345 we started diagnosing “redefinition” errors for >> > typedefs of anonymous tags that are *not visible* in case like this: >> > >> > module that isn’t imported: >> > typedef struct { … } Foo_t; >> > source file: >> > typedef struct { … } Foo_t; >> > >> > I think the only change needed is to not consider these anonymous tags to >> > be the same entity unless we’re in C++. Patch attached. >> >> Looks fine. Do we also miscompute the linkage for these things in C (where >> types don't really have linkage), or is this just a problem because we bail >> out before we hit the isExternallyVisible check? > > > Ack, my copy of clang was a couple of days old and I guess you’ve been > working in this area! My patch is no longer sufficient…
Okay, committed this patch with an additional fix for the non-C++ linkage in r253123. Thanks, Ben > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
