Dushistov added inline comments. ================ Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/QtSignalSlotChecker.cpp:114 @@ +113,3 @@ + printMethodNameWithPramaTypes(Out, C, FName, M, false); + const std::string NS = qtNormalizeSignature(Out.str()); + if (NS == MethodWithParamsNorm) ---------------- jroelofs wrote: > Why are you throwing away all the work that the parser did to build up the > type signature as a QualType, pretty-printing it, and the re-parsing it by > hand? ISTM it would be much better if qtNormalizeSignature had this type > signature: `QualType qtNormalizeSignature(QualType)`. Looks like `reviews` have no SMTP interface, so duplicate answer here:
First of all this code compare two things:
1)QualType from clang,
2)string that I get from
connect(obj1, "1f(unsgined int)", obj2, "2g(uint)");
^ ^
here and here
so to simplify things I need compare QualType and data from
StringLiteral.
The second thing, that should be menntioned,that
"Qt normalization" and converting output to string
(this normalization used by Qt when it compare at runtime
that signal match slot)
not match exactly to already existing in clang
"print type functionality":
- it remove spaces every where, where possible
- it print "uint" instead of "unsigned int"
so I glad to have inteface like this
`QualType qtNormalizeSignature(QualType)`
but to use such interface I need convert StringLiteral conent
to function signature, in other words run parser inside parser,
plus I have to hack PrintType from AST to make possible
print function signature in `Qt` way.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14592
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
