LGTM, thanks!

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It'd be simpler and would more directly match the C specification (and
> >> would handle a few other cases better, such as placeholder types and
> atomic
> >> types) if you instead passed the operand through DefaultLvalueConversion
> >
> >
> > or rather, DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion =)
>
> That was the magic incantation I didn't find before; thank you for
> pointing it out! Updated patch attached.
>
> ~Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to