rmaprath added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D14293#280982, @rengolin wrote:
> Hi Asiri, > > Can I propose a different approach? > > We now have a silent buildbot, which will never email people about breakages, > but can be publicly monitored by you, me and others. I'm assuming you have > access to at least one x86 and one ARM machines, so that you could set up a > local buildbot, reporting to the buildmaster, without upsetting anyone else, > but where I, Jon, Marshall can also see the progress of all tests being > fixed, thus helping approving the patches for future fixes. > > You don't need to share any information on the board, just connect to the > master and start building... > > Once the bot is green, we can add the builds on our own public hardware, > avoiding the need for disabling the tests. > > cheers, > --renato Counter proposal, we mark all the currently failing (-fno-exceptions) test cases with: // XFAIL: libcpp-no-exceptions This has the following advantages: - No need to change buildbots to skip tests - The bots will catch any regressions in those tests that are already passing under -fno-exceptions - You will be able to monitor my progress with the test fixes using the public (-fno-exceptions) buildbots - I don't have to setup local buildbots (this is very difficult for us, infrastructure / legal problems) What do you think? - Asiri http://reviews.llvm.org/D14293 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
