john.brawn added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12903#247934, @compnerd wrote:
> While I agree that this makes the option much nicer to use, it collides with > the -l flag. Since it was an internal only option until this point, we > should rename it before exposing it at the driver level. Yes, you're right. GCC uses -fplugin=name.so for their plugin interface, which seems reasonable so I'll go with that to avoid having to think up something myself. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D12903 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
