xazax.hun added inline comments. ================ Comment at: include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions.h:515-517 @@ -511,1 +514,5 @@ + /// Returns true if lambdas should be inlined. Otherwise a sink node will be + /// generated each time a LambdaExpr is visited. + bool shouldInlineLambdas(); + ---------------- xazax.hun wrote: > jordan_rose wrote: > > "inline" is kind of a misnomer, since we may not actually inline lambdas. I > > would have suggested "model lambdas" or "lambda support". > Even when this configuration option is set to false, the body of the lambda > is analyzed as a top level function. For this reason I think the "lambda > support" might be a misnomer too. What do you think? If we come up with a better name for the option I will address that in a separate patch.
Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D12652 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
