skalinichev added a comment. AFAIUI the canonical type could never be an elaborated type, but just type could.
And yes before we used nested name specifier from the type name as written in the source code (a.k.a. ElaboratedType), now we use nested name specifier of the type that the elaborated type refers to. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11797 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits