skalinichev added a comment.

AFAIUI the canonical type could never be an elaborated type, but just type 
could.

And yes before we used nested name specifier from the type name as written in 
the source code (a.k.a. ElaboratedType), now we use nested name specifier of 
the type that the elaborated type refers to.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D11797



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to