On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote: > EricWF added a comment. > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12247#233323, @davidxl wrote: > >> We certainly need a fix without breaking ABI. Is there a ABI conformance >> test for libcxx? > > > Well this patch definitely breaks the ABI. This was my attempt at fixing the > problem in `std::function` that might not be ABI breaking.. > https://gist.github.com/EricWF/3a35b140a66d4826a9d0.
Great. My question is more general about testing any potentially ABI breaking changes. David > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D12247 > > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
