Prazek added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11859#225025, @rjmccall wrote:
> Mostly LGTM. Are you going to emit assumptions for vbptrs in a separate > patch? I wasn't planning to. I am focusing now on upgrading GVN for using new invariant.barrier metadata. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11859 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
