On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:52:55PM -0700, Jim Goodnow II wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Yes, we do. The real purpose of the nullptr is the last part of the test > program where it allows you to distinguish between two overloaded > functions, i.e.: > > void func( int ); > void func( int *);
I don't see how it matters here. But what about classic variadic functions? nullptr is a valid sentinal for execl, NULL isn't. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
