Prazek added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp:190-191
@@ -189,4 +189,4 @@
// Fix up the returned value, if necessary.
- for (llvm::Function::iterator I = Fn->begin(), E = Fn->end(); I != E; I++)
{
- llvm::Instruction *T = I->getTerminator();
+ for (auto &BBlock : *Fn) {
+ llvm::Instruction *T = BBlock.getTerminator();
if (isa<llvm::ReturnInst>(T)) {
----------------
majnemer wrote:
> We all take issue with some part of the coding style but it is important that
> we all stick to it.
Yep, I hope my middle aproach with "BBblock" is similiar enough. Seriously name
like BB for newbie like me doesn't give me any information more than 2 random
letters
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11446
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
