ahatanak added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11319#208367, @echristo wrote:
> Question: > > Would it be better to just use reserve=NUM and parse that rather than the > single +/- per register? Or is it just not worth it here? I guess it could be useful for debugging or testing code-gen passes (for example, register allocator). AArch64 has a similar option "aarch64-reserve-x18". Are there other targets or use cases that require reserving registers? http://reviews.llvm.org/D11319 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
