Couple of inline comments, and I'm still not a huge fan of the
getTargetToolChain bits. It seems like we should be able to have a single
interface to getting a target toolchain that works for both cases. Maybe
compute the triple up front for use in the rest of the driver for the host?
Good lord cuda is terrible. :)
-eric
================
Comment at: include/clang/Driver/Driver.h:412-414
@@ -411,2 +411,5 @@
/// on-demand.
+ const ToolChain &getTargetToolChain(const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args,
+ const llvm::Triple &Target) const;
+
const ToolChain &getToolChain(const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args,
----------------
The comments no longer match the code here.
================
Comment at: lib/Driver/Driver.cpp:822-823
@@ -820,3 +821,4 @@
static unsigned PrintActions1(const Compilation &C, Action *A,
- std::map<Action*, unsigned> &Ids) {
+ std::map<Action *, unsigned> &Ids);
+
----------------
Can you rearrange the code so that it doesn't need the forward declaration?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9509
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
