sorry but I am personally skeptic about this checker.

why is the void removed?

it does not cause any wrong behaviour to keep it.

the void is not likely added there by mistake, is it? the developer probably 
wrote it by intention and this checker thinks that the developer intentions are 
wrong..

how about moving it to clang-modernize?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to