On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Meador Inge <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would prefer this to be worded differently. It's specific to >> Microsoft's attributes, and "attribute block" isn't a term of art I'm >> used to. How about: > > FWIW, it is the same error that the VC++ compiler emits: > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0ka5hw13.aspx
While reasonable to model after their wording, I still don't think it's a particularly good way to word the diagnostic, especially since these can be used in conjunction with C++-style attributes. We could use "Microsoft attribute block cannot be empty" if "block" is a sensible term that others want. ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
