I am not actually sure here. The pro is that it doesn't really belong with the
"{". The con is that it looks a lot more like a multiplication. Not so
important for "int", but as soon as you have something where you aren't exactly
sure that it is a type, this can get confusing.
Also, there is the consistency with "int *f() { return nullptr; }" which we
should think about.
All in all, I don't see compelling reasons to do this change yet (but I can be
convinced).
All of this just shows that the pointer belongs with the type ;-).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10410
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
