Alexey, There must have been some miscommunication. I've replied the following on the thread discussing the "Static Analyzer Checker Options Proposal". As far as I can tell, your implementation differs to what was proposed. I have not received any reply to that. We are interested in this functionality, but do not agree with some aspects of this patch.
" On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Anna Zaks <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Aleksei, I believe that with your implementation, it's assumed that the checker always wants to inherit the options of the parent package (it’s not opt in). Also, since you don’t support query by checker/package name, there is no ability for the checker to query the package options. Anna. " http://reviews.llvm.org/D3967 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
