Piggy backing for a +1 on this. Really would love if bad packages would be recalled, and also if packages would follow release announcement, rather than precede it.
For anyone wondering, this is the likely changelog for 13.2.3 in case people want to know what is in it. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/25637/commits/fe854ac1729a5353fa646298a0b4550101f9c6b2 <https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/25637/commits/fe854ac1729a5353fa646298a0b4550101f9c6b2> Reed > On Jan 4, 2019, at 10:07 AM, Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 04/01/2019 15:34, Abhishek Lekshmanan wrote: >> Ashley Merrick <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> If this is another nasty bug like .2? Can’t you remove .3 from being >>> available till .4 comes around? >> >> This time there isn't a nasty bug, just a a couple of more fixes in .4 >> which would be better to have. We're building 12.2.4 as we speak >>> Myself will wait for proper confirmation always but others may run an apt >>> upgrade for any other reason and end up with .3 packages. > > Without wishing to bang on about this, how is it still the case that > packages are being pushed onto the official ceph.com repos that people > shouldn't install? This has caused plenty of people problems on several > occasions now, and a number of people have offered help to fix it... > > Regards, > > Matthew > > > > -- > The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research > Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a > company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered > office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
