FWIW, newer Ceph releases offer the ability to configure an “archive zone” where objects are immutable, which can free your primary zone from having to maintain multiple versions. The archive zone might be on slower hardware and/or with a replication strategy that trades off performance for capacity. E.g. 8,3 EC on QLC SSDs or spinners.
> On Jun 19, 2025, at 9:34 AM, Eugen Block <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The affected buckets have versioning activated. Plus object locking too. >> They get used by a backup software (Kopia) that uses these features to >> provide ransomware protection. So my thinking is that maybe with versioning >> active, each object in a bucket could result in multiple omap entries, maybe >> one per version or something? >> >> If that is the case, then maybe I should reduce `rgw_max_objs_per_shard` >> from 100'000 to something like 10'000 to have the buckets resharded more >> aggressively? > > So maybe that's already the answer here. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
