I have seen the issue.

In my experience, running "ceph pg repair <pg>" fixes the issue, but one
must wait for the repair to commence and finish. So dont expect it to fix
it immediately; the repair needs to be scheduled and processed.

Respectfully,

*Wes Dillingham*
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham>
[email protected]




On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:46 PM Work Ceph <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for the prompt response!
>
> I think that I did not understand. So, you have seen the issue I
> mentioned? Or, the issue of "ceph pg repair" not working properly?
>
> If you have seen the issue I mentioned, how did you overcome it?
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 4:43 PM Wesley Dillingham <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, seen it, issuing a "ceph pg repair <pg>" has never not fixed it post
>> repair.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> *Wes Dillingham*
>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham>
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:40 PM Work Ceph <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> We are facing an unexpected error with a single PG after a node addition.
>>>
>>> We are seeing the following error message:
>>> ```
>>>  scrub : stat mismatch, got 299586/299585 objects, 0/0 clones,
>>> 299586/299585 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 pinned, 0/0 hit_set_archive, 0/0
>>> whiteouts, 366757864470/366755158108 bytes, 0/0 manifest objects, 0/0
>>> hit_set_archive bytes.
>>> log_channel(cluster) log [ERR]  scrub 1 error
>>> ```
>>>
>>> It looks as if there is an extra object in the PG. Have you guys ever
>>> seen
>>> such a situation?
>>>
>>>
>>> The command "rados list-inconsistent-snapset" does not return anything.
>>> The
>>> command "rados list-inconsistent-pg" only returns the affected PG.
>>> The command "rados list-inconsistent-obj" does not return anything.
>>>
>>> We are suspecting that this might be caused by the number of PGs in the
>>> pool, which is too small. However, before trying to increase it, we are
>>> trying to understand what is going on.
>>>
>>> Is it safe to increase the number of PGs with a PG inconsistent with this
>>> situation with an extra object?
>>>
>>> We are running Ceph on Ubuntu 22. We are using the standard Ceph binaries
>>> from the distro.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to