I see. Maybe the drive failed exactly in that moment when the primary
OSD got a new write, tried to replicate it to secondary and tertiary,
but the ack could not be committed, resulting in the unfound object
because the other two OSDs knew there was a newer copy but couldn't be
found. I'm not sure if this makes sense, but it could explain it a
little. But I feel like this isn't going to settle your debate. ;-)
Zitat von Alex <[email protected]>:
Sorry I didn't make it clear.
We marked the osd as out, the error cleared, then we replaced the drive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
