Here’s a benchmark of another setup I did a few months back, with NVME flash
drives and a Mellanox EVPN fabric (Spectrum ASIC) between the nodes (no RDMA).
3 hosts and 24 drives in total.
root@test01:~# fio --ioengine=libaio --filename=/dev/sdb --direct=1 --sync=1
--rw=write --bs=4K --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --name=fio
fio: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B,
ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-3.33
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][100.0%][w=6966KiB/s][w=1741 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
fio: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=115698: Tue May 28 16:54:38 2024
write: IOPS=1804, BW=7218KiB/s (7391kB/s)(423MiB/60001msec); 0 zone resets
slat (nsec): min=2872, max=92926, avg=5026.65, stdev=2710.03
clat (usec): min=419, max=4486, avg=548.34, stdev=54.66
lat (usec): min=461, max=4490, avg=553.37, stdev=55.02
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 486], 5.00th=[ 502], 10.00th=[ 510], 20.00th=[ 523],
| 30.00th=[ 529], 40.00th=[ 537], 50.00th=[ 545], 60.00th=[ 553],
| 70.00th=[ 562], 80.00th=[ 570], 90.00th=[ 586], 95.00th=[ 594],
| 99.00th=[ 660], 99.50th=[ 758], 99.90th=[ 1156], 99.95th=[ 1287],
| 99.99th=[ 2606]
bw ( KiB/s): min= 6664, max= 8072, per=100.00%, avg=7225.95, stdev=268.19,
samples=119
iops : min= 1666, max= 2018, avg=1806.49, stdev=67.05, samples=119
lat (usec) : 500=4.95%, 750=94.52%, 1000=0.38%
lat (msec) : 2=0.13%, 4=0.02%, 10=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.57%, sys=1.46%, ctx=108317, majf=0, minf=12
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=0,108275,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=7218KiB/s (7391kB/s), 7218KiB/s-7218KiB/s (7391kB/s-7391kB/s),
io=423MiB (443MB), run=60001-60001msec
Disk stats (read/write):
sdb: ios=80/108093, merge=0/0, ticks=21/59172, in_queue=59193, util=99.96%
This was in an instance inside VMware, so there was iSCSI involved in the data
path in addition to the normal Ceph replication, with Ceph being mostly
out-of-the-box and standard.
I wouldn’t believe 40 (or 400 in the SSD cluster) would be a bad value had I
not seen substantially better values in the past. And even the 1000 would be a
very substantial improvement compared to what I see now.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Gerhard Loschwitz
Geschäftsführer / CEO, True West IT Services GmbH
P +49 2433 5253130 <tel:+49 2433 5253130>
M +49 176 61832178 <https://mysig.io/4ngY23j0>
A Schmiedegasse 24a, 41836 Hückelhoven, Deutschland
R HRB 21985, Amtsgericht Mönchengladbach <https://mysig.io/b4g0y3rz>
<https://mysignature.io/editor?utm_source=expiredpixel>
True West IT Services GmbH is compliant with the GDPR regulation on data
protection and privacy in the European Union and the European Economic Area.
You can request the information on how we collect and process your private data
according to the law by contacting the email sender.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
