I am using ceph 17.2.6 on Rocky 8.
I have a system that started giving me large omap object warnings.
I tracked this down to a specific index shard for a single s3 bucket.
rados -p <indexpool> listomapkeys .dir.<zoneid>.bucketid.nn.shardid
shows over 3 million keys for that shard. There are only about 2
million objects in the entire bucket according to a listing of the bucket
and radosgw-admin bucket stats --bucket bucketname. No other shard
has anywhere near this many index objects. Perhaps it should be noted that this
shard is the highest numbered shard for this bucket. For a bucket with
16 shards, this is shard 15.
If I look at the list of omapkeys generated, there are *many*
beginning with "<80>0_0000", almost the entire set of the three + million
keys in the shard. These are index objects in the so-called 'ugly' namespace.
The rest ofthey omapkeys appear to be normal.
The 0_0000 after the <80> indicates some sort of 'bucket log index' according
to src/cls/rgw/cls_rgw.cc.
However, using some sed magic previously discussed here, I ran:
rados -p <indexpool> getomapval .dir.<zoneid>.bucketid.nn.shardid
--omap-key-file /tmp/key.txt
Where /tmp/key.txt contains only the funny <80>0_0000 key name without a newline
The output of this shows, in a hex dump, the object name to which the index
refers, which was at one time a valid object.
However, that object no longer exists in the bucket, and based on expiration
policy, was
previously deleted. Let's say, in the hex dump, that the object was:
foo/bar/baz/object1.bin
The prefix foo/bar/baz/ used to have 32 objects, say foo/bar/baz/{object1.bin,
object2.bin, ... }
An s3api listing shows that those objects no longer exist (and that is OK, as
they were previously deleted).
BUT, now, there is a weirdo object left in the bucket:
foo/bar/baz/ <- with the slash at the end, and it is an object not a PRE (fix).
All objects under foo/ have a 3 day lifecycle expiration. If I wait(at most) 3
days, the weirdo object with '/'
at the end will be deleted, or I can delete it manually using aws s3api. But
either way, the log index
objects, <80>0_0000.... remain.
The bucket in question is heavily used. But with over 3 million of these
<80>0_0000 objects (and growing)
in a single shard, I am currently at a loss as to what to do or how to stop
this from occuring.
I've poked around at a few other buckets, and I found a few others that have
this problem, but not enoughto cause a large omap warning. (A few hundred
<80>0_000.... index objects in a shard), no where near enoughto cause the large
omap warning that led me to this post.
Any ideas?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
