Yeah, it should be fine.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Loic Dachary <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After todays private discussion and the merge of 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6161, I will assume the current hammer 
> branch (7f485ed5aa620fe982561663bf64356b7e2c38f2) is ready for QE to start 
> their own round of testing. If I misinterpreted what you wrote, please speak 
> up and I'll do what's needed ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> On 02/10/2015 22:31, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer 
>> passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-58).
>> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of 
>> testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#Release-information has direct 
>> links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.3 in case you need 
>> more context about one of them.
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to