On 08/26/2013 09:33 AM Joerg Schilling wrote:
> ken <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> This cdfs does not deliver better quality than from using the "read audio"
>>> ioctls from the kernel. Cdda2wav gives much better quylity in case of
>>> non-optiimal media and cdda2wav gives you the meta data you need to make a
>>> decent copy. You don't get that from cdfs.
>>>
>>> Jörg
>>>
>>
>> I was asking about *mounting* an audio CD.  Is there a way to mount an
>> audio CD in any of the software you mentioned?
>
> No, but why do you like to "mount" an audio CD?
>
> Jörg
>

I gave a couple reasons previously in this thread... too involved to 
repeat.  There must be a lot of other reasons if so many people have 
spent time developing cdfs for so long a time.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to