Actually, as of RHEL6, the default MTA is now Postfix. Sendmail does indeed have a rather lengthy history of vulnerabilities. With that being said, in my opinion, Postfix is also a much more flexible MTA.
Josh -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:55 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail substitute? On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Alexander Dalloz <[email protected]> wrote: > > What is the rationale behind deactivating Sendmail. Just curious. Or is it > the typical rant "Sendmail is insecure, see its history"? I don't understand why many people calling sendmail insecure. Sendmail is the default MTA in RHEL, Solaris, AIX, FreeBSD, OpenBSD ... Why should they use an insecure MTA? Sendmail is a very robust and reliable MTA. Best regards, Morten _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
