> On Sep 10, 2025, at 1:34 PM, Jim Davis via cctalk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yep, 16 bits, or even 32 seemed like a lot, If you're writing asm, It is. > But like you alluded to, it's not good enough for the stuff we expect today, That depends a lot on what sort of "stuff" you work with. For various fun projects I use the Raspberry Pico, which is a 32 bit microcontroller with 1/4 or 1/2 MB of RAM, which is quite a lot. But a bunch of that work uses the PIO engines -- basically programmable state machines that talk to the I/O pins. Those have 16 bit instructions, and a 32 word program memory. No data RAM, just a couple of registers. Quite powerful, though. One application is the DDCMP controller I published a while ago. I'm thinking about making it talk Ethernet in software as the next exercise... paul
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly Lan... Carey Schug via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly Language ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly Lan... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Asse... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 ... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly Lan... Jim Davis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Assembly... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 Asse... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Fun with PDP11 ... Jim Davis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun with PDP... Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun with... Jim Davis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun ... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun ... Jim Davis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun ... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun ... Milo Velimirović via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: [List] Re: Fun ... ben via cctalk
