sgu wrote:
>
> hnmmmmm... so I am the chosen one :)). Thanks anyways.
>
Shhh!!! Don't bring more attention to it than necessary! You'll get me
in trouble with my fellow castor developers...then I'll be an outcast
and shunned for life.
> SourceGenarator still does not generate correct object
> type even though I used anonymous complexType
> definition.
Right, that's the problem. Use a top-level complexType definition
instead:
<xs:complexType name="info">
<xs:all>
...
</xsl:all>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="...">
<xs:sequence>
<element name="information" type="info"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
That will work...works fine for me.
If you use an anonymous typedef, there is no way for you to actually
reference it. That's why it's called anonymous! :-)
> I will give a shot to this by using binding file you mentioned.
>
Hope it works for you,
--Keith
> --- Keith Visco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > sgu wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Keith, etc:
> > >
> > > I don't know why I cannot get any response after I
> > > repeatedly post the same question on this forum.I
> > have
> > > searched through archives and docs, and found
> > nothing
> > > related to this.
> >
> > I can shed some light on this...
> >
> > We all held a meeting the other day, and we choose
> > by random the people
> > that we refuse to answer questions from.
> > Unfortunately your name was
> > choosen...but since it appears that you're on to us,
> > I guess I can make
> > an exception and try to answer you mail. I just hope
> > the others don't
> > see me doing this or I could be excluded from
> > choosing the next round
> > names for people to annoy! :-)
> >
> > >
> > > I am evaluating xmlbeans and castor, Castor can do
> > > what xmlbeans cannot do, for example: generate
> > default
> > > constructors for java objects, implement equals,
> > > cleaner getters/setters, etc. We need these nice
> > > things in order to integrate with Hibernate. The
> > only
> > > thing I need to know now is: how to generate
> > component
> > > objects for nested elements while manipulating
> > their
> > > names. If Castor can do this, we may go ahead
> > > integrate Castor with Huibernate. I am wondering
> > if
> > > castor-xml can do this.
> > >
> > > so, please give me a word on this so that I can
> > choose
> > > which path to go. Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Castor has a source generation binding file which
> > will let you custom
> > the names of the fields...
> >
> > > I have 2 schema files info.xsd and message.xsd, if
> > I
> > > use include as following:
> > >
> > > info.xsd:
> > >
> > > ......
> > > <xs:element name="info">
> > > <xs:complexType>
> > > <xs:all>
> > > <xs:element name="createdBy"
> > type="xs:string"/>
> > > </xs:all>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > > </xs:element>
> > > ......
> > >
> > > message.xsd:
> > > <xs:include schemaLocation="info.xsd"
> > > namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"/>
> > >
> > > <xs:element name="message">
> > > <xs:complexType>
> > > <xs:all>
> > > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:string"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="info" minOccurs="1"
> > maxOccurs="1"
> > > />
> > > </xs:all>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > > </xs:element>
> > >
> > > I get the correct results:
> > > Info getInfo();
> >
> >
> > OK...so far so good....
> >
> >
> > >
> > > But if I want to have something like this:
> > > Info getInfomation();
> > >
> > > Here information should be of type Info in Message
> > > class, I modified message.xsd:
> > >
> > > <xs:element name="message">
> > > <xs:complexType>
> > > <xs:all>
> > > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:string"/>
> > > <xs:element name="infomation"
> > > type="info" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" />
> > > </xs:all>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > > </xs:element>
> > >
> > > then I still get:
> > >
> > > Object getInformation();
> > >
> >
> >
> > Right...because type "info" doesn't exist. At least
> > not in the schema
> > fragment you gave. Actually, I'm surprised no error
> > message is given
> > about that.
> >
> > You can refer to an element using element ref, but
> > you cannot ref to an
> > anonymous complexType definition.
> >
> > If you have a complexType such as:
> >
> > <complexType name="info">
> > <xs:all>
> > <xs:element name="createdBy"
> > type="xs:string"/>
> > </xs:all>
> > ...
> > </complexType>
> >
> > Then it would work...because type="info" would then
> > refer to this type.
> >
> > > It seems that using ref can generate correct
> > > getter/setter for containing objects, but it does
> > let
> > > me to specify property names. Is there any way
> > around?
> >
> > When using element ref, no you can't change the name
> > of the element,
> > it's purely a reference to an existing declaration.
> >
> > Castor will let you change the name of the
> > getter/setter methods however
> > in the binding file.
> >
> > For an example binding file take a look at the
> > src/examples/SourceGenerator directory, it contains
> > a bindingInvoice.xml
> > file which should be a good enough example to get
> > you started with that.
> >
> > And please...don't tell anyone I responded to your
> > e-mail...it could
> > ruin my reputation! ;-)
> >
> > I hope that helps,
> >
> > --Keith
> >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send
> > mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> > unsubscribe castor-dev
> >
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
