cheers,

I'll get it fixed for v3.0.1 whenever that is :)

@K

On 25/03/2012 3:21 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:
Registered with failing test: http://issues.castleproject.org/issue/IOC-334

Cheers,
Mauricio

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Thanks, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking some known
    breaking change or something like that.
    I'll try to come up with a proper test for this.

    Cheers,
    Mauricio


    2012/3/22 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>

        I think it's a regression.

        Not sure exactly about the details what changed that caused it
        to stop working and why none of our tests caught that. I'm
        pretty sure we have tests that depend on the config, so I
        think it's unlikely it's not populated when it's not there
        anymore.

        Please add that to YouTrack.

        @K




        On 22/03/2012 7:37 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:

            While trying to upgrade the Quartz.NET facility (
            https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/QuartzNetIntegration
            ) to Windsor 3, I found a breaking change I'm not sure how
            to overcome.

            Concretely, this test breaks:
            
https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/QuartzNetIntegration/blob/5fca07bb7252b18b06a77e88cecc1181c39d1787/QuartzNetIntegration.Tests/FacilityTests.cs#L31
            because FacilityConfig is null.

            It looks as if the facility's FacilityConfig property
            isn't being populated from the ConfigurationStore.

            I received a patch with a workaround that simply skips the
            FacilityConfig and passes an IConfiguration explicitly :
            
https://github.com/jochenjonc/QuartzNetIntegration/commit/78cb6f191bf00a02f3ebccd17c01998882705c1f

            But it's really a workaround... any ideas why I can't get
            the FacilityConfig to work?
            Of course, this used to work in Windsor 2.5.

            Thanks.

            Mauricio

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
            To post to this group, send email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
            To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
            For more options, visit this group at
            http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.


-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
        To post to this group, send email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
        [email protected]
        <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
        For more options, visit this group at
        http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle 
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to