Hi Dan,

I was unaware that the compiler was able to remove unused logic, that's
pretty useful.
What I need is one real input to one complex output, so I'll check Nitish
model and import it to ROACH2 if I need to, thanks for the info.

On a sidenote: It is possible still to join the slack? I remember something
was mentioned about sending an email earlier this year.

Thanks,

Franco

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:10 PM Dan Werthimer <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> hi franco,
>
> are you looking for an FFT with a real input and complex output?
>
> you mentioned you are connected the unused inputs of the the
> biplex_real-4x to ground.
> this is useful, as the compiler should remove all the unused parts of the
> FFT,
> although it's probably not as resource efficient as a dedicated single
> input real to complex FFT.
>
> if you need further reduction in resources,
> nitish recently developed a single stream complex to complex fft.
> nitish's posting on casper's snap slack channel is appended below .
>
> you could modify nitish's design to compute  two reals in one complex FFT,
> or a single real of N points in an N/2 complex FFT.
>
> best wishes,
>
> dan
>
> ------------------------------
> new messages
> Nitish <https://app.slack.com/team/UMWDNQD7W> 10:54 PM
> <https://casper-astro.slack.com/archives/CMNK6V19Q/p1576911266004700>
> Hi, in reference to our previous discussion concerning the complex FFT of
> a single stream of samples, we wanted to share the piece of the design
> which worked, might prove useful to someone. So, we clock the SNAP at 250
> MHz and ADC is done at 250 MSps, thus one sample per clock cycle. We wished
> to perform complex FFT, which would require a block taking 1 stream at 1
> sample per clock. The blocks available could only take powers of 2 samples
> in parallel from a given stream, thus we had to find another way. Thanks to
> Jack Hickish, we managed to make a small design with the FFT internal
> blocks which performs the job. Please find attached. Channels 1 and 2 are
> two separate streams (two distinct signals) coming from the mixer and they
> contain 1 complex sample per clock cycle. The example shows a 2048 points
> FFT. The unscrambler block is needed to put some order in the frequency
> channels output. The channels from any one output have to be put in order
> using this small code for example:
>
> for i in range(0, 1024):
>     spectrum1.append(channels1[i])
>     spectrum1.append(channels1[2047 - i])
>
> (edited)
> Single_stream_complex_FFT.jpg
> [image: Single_stream_complex_FFT.jpg]
>
> <https://files.slack.com/files-pri/THU1J9JDC-FRYDQAY5S/single_stream_complex_fft.jpg>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 9:31 AM Franco <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Is there an FFT block in the CASPER library (ROACH2) that can be used as
>> 1 input -> 1 output? The closest thing I've found is the 'fft' block which
>> has a minimum of 2 inputs.
>>
>> For now I'm using the fft_biplex_real-4x and zeroing 3 of the 4 inputs,
>> but that's wasteful. I've also tried the Xilinx FFT block, but it has a
>> strange problem where the noise floor increase considerably when injecting
>> a tone at the middle point between two FFT bins.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Franco Curotto
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "[email protected]" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CACBfcEnPcxk-k4oFTD__%2BVYkTsGTSc%2B85uiLqejdEUthdGXwLA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CACBfcEnPcxk-k4oFTD__%2BVYkTsGTSc%2B85uiLqejdEUthdGXwLA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
> [email protected]" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CAGHS_vFeEcLgYhcYLfL8KuYM4%3DzcDkmk4yC%2BgWWqc%2BttDi40pA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CAGHS_vFeEcLgYhcYLfL8KuYM4%3DzcDkmk4yC%2BgWWqc%2BttDi40pA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CACBfcEn1O-RhKbRhpo2XDDgWhSpshQUadpMkq3KZ%3Dnstsgzwtw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to