WHILE CAMBODIA REMAINS OCCUPIED BY VIETNAM 1979-2008:THE UNITED NATIONS SAY 
THIS :Oct. 21, 1986 The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/41/6, by 
vote of 116-21 with 13 abstentions, calling for a withdrawal of Vietnamese 
forces from Cambodia.
SOLUTIONS:
America calls Vietnam to restore Cambodia 
Independence .President Reagan's address to the 43d Session of the United 
Nations General 
Assembly in New York, New York . September 26, 1988. "Mr. Secretary-General, 
there are new hopes for Cambodia, a nation whose freedom and 
independence we seek just as avidly as we sought the freedom and independence 
of A
fghanistan. We urge the rapid removal of all Vietnamese troops ...."
TO ALL KHMER LET US GET ORGANIZED AND REVOLT AGAINST THE VIETNAMESE OCCUPATION 
OF CAMBODIA AND AGAINST THE CLOSE COLLABORATION OF THE KHMER MONARCHY WITH 
 




Story on Vietnamese bride service draws criticism





 


Mark Lin’s business card advertising his licensed marriage brokerage service in 
Singapore
A Straits Times story on a Vietnamese bride service in Singapore has drawn 
criticism from a Vietnamese diplomat and international journalists for treating 
the issue with indifference and even encouraging the practice. 



An October 24 Straits Times article with the headline “Vietnam brides: Agency 
slashes fees” reported that the Vietnam Brides International Matchmaker company 
was charging half-price for Singaporean men seeking Vietnamese spouses, 
attributing the discount to the global financial crisis. 

According to the story, Mark Lin of Vietnam Brides International Matchmaker was 
charging SG$4,000 to fix up potential Singaporean husbands with potential 
Vietnamese brides.
Three Vietnamese women had been hanging around at the agency for weeks waiting 
for husbands, the article said. “Business has never been so bad - not even 
during the SARS outbreak in 2003,” the article quoted Lin as saying.
Many readers say that by not criticizing the practice of overseas matchmaking, 
which many see as akin to human trafficking, the article had in fact condoned 
it.
Many have said that by using the price cut as the headline, the article was 
serving as advertising for the business.
A journalist from a leading international news agency recently wrote to Thanh 
Nien: “It's horrible to see them [Vietnamese would-be brides] ‘discounted’ like 
they are a sack of rice or a pair of shoes.”
“Unfortunately, money talks loudly and overrides social and moral 
considerations. Since I really love the Vietnamese people, it hurt me to see 
the article,” the journalist said.
“I felt bad for the women they featured. I guess there must be mixed feelings 
in Vietnam about this issue, on one hand, I would like to think that some of 
the ladies find love and a better life in Singapore, but I know Vietnamese are 
a very proud culture (and have many good reasons to be proud).”
Speaking with a Thanh Nien correspondent on a recent Singapore trip, former 
deputy head of the parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee Ton Nu Thi Ninh said 
she was stunned to see such a respected newspaper running a very insensitive 
story on a very sensitive topic.
Ninh said that even though transnational marriage brokerage services between 
Singaporean men and foreign women were legal in Singapore, she said the 
practice “sold” women into marriage.
In Vietnam, individuals and organizations are forbidden to carry out marriage 
brokerages.
Though only non-profit women’s associations can establish marriage support 
centers and marriage consultation services, the Vietnamese Ministry of Justice 
has recommended that the government legalize marriage brokering so central 
authorities could oversee and control the matchmaking.
Ninh said the article had simply cashed in on gullible women, especially the 
three mentioned in the article, who were all pictured without their faces 
blurred.
Such articles in Vietnam always blur the women’s faces.
The Straits Times’ reporter Theresa Tan, who wrote the article, said in an 
email to Thanh Nien that she did indeed consider the fact that Singaporean men 
pay a marriage broker to find Vietnamese brides a social problem.
“That's why we report on such issues,” she said.
She said the paper was under no obligation to change the names or blur the 
faces of the girls involved as they had all agreed to the article.
The Vietnamese government is now considering proposals to clamp down on illegal 
marriage brokering after several high-profile cases this year and last.
Authorities are also considering revising Vietnam’s laws on marrying foreigners.
The Straits Times is a Singapore-based daily newspaper.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: Boang 
Thom, Congratulations!!Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:40:23 -0800

 
 
Democrat Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote :Hor Nam Hong's , Ong Yin tieng, 
SOK SIPHANA, Khieu Kanharit are from the Dog meat eating culture.Because ,in 
dog meat eating culture, children know only this language:No one care with what 
you said because we know that your skull is filledwith dog's shit."Corruption, 
corruption, corruption". said World Bank Président JamesWolfensohn to Cham 
Prasidh.80% des exportations and 270 000 jobs at the garment factories 
thatemployed 90% Vietnamese illegal workers disguised as as Cambodians,coming 
torob all jobs reserved for unemployed poor oppressed Cambodians in their 
owncountry. 
Cham Prasidh & SOK SIPHANA ( Yuon married to Khieu Khanarit 'yuonrelative) 
allowed the mafia to export the same amount of unemployed Cambodian 
citizensmen,women, girl, children as cheap labor, slave, prostitutes in 
Malaysia,Thailand and abroad .
When World Bank président James Wolfensohn signs this song to Hun Sen andhis 
Yuon's advisors Corruption, corruption, 
corruption".========================================================>From DOG 
MEAT EATING association or Democrat Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Date: Wed, 
26 Nov 2008 22:38:56 -0800> Subject: Re: Boang Thom, Congratulations!!> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected]> > > Clarification:> > "... who 
encourage me to continue to be proud ..."> > should have been:> > "... whose 
rationality encourages me to continue to be proud ...".> > Soriya> > On Nov 26, 
9:58 pm, Soriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > 
Ref:http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc/browse_thread/thread/a29782cb7...> 
>> > Boang Thom,> >> > Congratulations on such a wondeful article!! I agree 
with you on> > everything you say here. Only if most Cambodians are like you!!> 
>> > This is your segment that makes me laugh out loud again & again:> >> > 
"... krao pee ta tumpehk chiang kumnou ning ta konhchass Chau> > Bury ...".> >> 
> Thank You Thank You. Laughing is good for our health.> >> > You're one of the 
few Cambodians in here CamDisc who encourage me to> > continue to be proud to 
tell people the truth that I'm from Cambodia,> > not to lie to them that I'm 
from China or Hong Kong as they initially> > think.> >> > Boang Thom, take 
comfort in that all other responses to your article> > so far are insults & 
curses, not arguments against your article. None> > of them provides any 
argument against your opinion. As usual, the only> > thing they know is to 
insult & to curse.> >> > Buddha Bless Cambodia.> >> > Soriya> 
</html_________________________________________________________________
Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_112008
 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to