Eugene Prokopiev wrote: > Hi, > > My provider uses very strange softswitch which uses payload type = 97 > for dtmf transmission. I have patch to resolve this probles but it > seems incompatible with ilbc. Is it possible rewrite it with ilbc > support in mind and apply it? > > I can't create new ticket because after submitting I got "Page not found" :( > 97 is what the far end want to call RFC2833. 97 is what we want to call iLBC. There is no conflict.
The Hua Wei switches are quite popular, and various people have interfaced with them. I don't think your problem hasn't been report before. Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
