On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:45 AM Elvis Angelaccio <elvis.angelac...@kde.org> wrote: > > > > On 03/12/18 09:46, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Ben
Hi Elvis, > > > > > I've been informed by the PIM developers that they would like to bump > > the dependency of the Qt version they use, from Qt 5.9 which it's on > > currently, to Qt 5.10. > > > > As a consequence, due to many KDE projects using PIM libraries, their > > dependency on Qt will also be effectively bumped. To minimize the > > maintenance cost of this bump for the CI system, I would like to bump > > everyone up from Qt 5.9 to a newer version of Qt (otherwise we'll end > > up chasing down build failures for a long time) > > It's not clear if you are suggesting to bump the minimum required Qt > version in each CMakeLists.txt file, or if you are just going to bump > the Qt version used by the CI server. > > Could you please clarify? Thanks! I'll only be bumping the version used by the CI system, the applications themselves will be left unchanged. > > > > > As most distributions have moved on from 5.10, and use Qt 5.11 now > > (and will in many cases soon move to Qt 5.12), i'd like to suggest > > that instead of going to Qt 5.10, we move straight to 5.11. > > > > Because Frameworks has a two versions prior support policy, it'll > > remain on 5.9 for now until it's ready to move up to 5.10 (assuming > > 5.12 is a usable Qt version) > > > > If nobody has any objections, i'll proceed with this change in around > > 3 days time. > > > > Cheers, > > Ben > > > > Cheers, > Elvis Cheers, Ben
