On 3 October 2016 at 12:21, Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> wrote:
> On Monday, 3 October 2016 12:14:21 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 3 October 2016 at 12:06, Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> > wrote: > > > On Monday, 3 October 2016 12:02:14 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We're close to the 3.0 release. I plan to create tarballs today. > > > > > > > > Maintenance 3.0 branches have been created for Kexi projects > > > > (kexi/kdb/kproperty/kreport git) already. > > > > > > We should finalize the move of the libraries outside of playground > (which > > > requires anyway passing through kdereview). We don't usually track > stable > > > branches of translations for playground modules (if it has releases, > it's > > > not > > > playground). > > > > Good, > > I remember I had a review like this when we had some time to discuss: > > https://phabricator.kde.org/D2659. > > I see no points against the move, just you may remember we were not > really > > sure the move is good idea at the moment or needed: > > https://phabricator.kde.org/D2659#49459 > > I did not wrote that the move is not needed. I was commenting about the > final > destination. > If we put aside the destination, moving is required as "playground" and > "stable branches" don't mix according our rules. > > The step about "moving to kdereview" is not new and it is the usual rule > that > should (have) happen(ed) like in other similar cases, again regardless of > the > destination. > > > Would you (or anyone else) be able to assist me in the move so we're > ready > > for the release as planned? I did not allocate any resources for exactly > > this task today... > > You can release for the current, but we can't create the translation > branches > for the stable branch until this is settled. So if you want to release, I > would say (but I'm not part of release-team, which is not in CC either), > release today but then allocate the time to move stuff around. > > Thanks Luigi OK with doing that later then. Could you look at to tell me what parts of https://phabricator.kde.org/D2916 are OK and what not yet? Probably especially the stable_kf5=3.0 values. If there's anything documented feel free to share a checklist for the 'kdereview' task. > > > -- regards, Jaroslaw Staniek KDE: : A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators : and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org Calligra Suite: : A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org Kexi: : A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi Qt Certified Specialist: : http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
