----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124641/ -----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated March 25, 2016, 9:04 a.m.) Status ------ This change has been discarded. Review request for Calligra, Camilla Boemann and Thorsten Zachmann. Repository: calligra Description ------- The KoTextEditor::recursivelyVisitSelection() function had a bit complex conditional expression when there is a table inside the selection. This change is following the previous behaviour but the expression is built more logically. It isn't the shortest version, but it's much easier to understand and simpler to use. There are several cases of selecting a table, and it's not trivial to say whether entire or just a part is selected. * The process has been divided into two section: first, the conditional expression decides about the visiting mode (party or entirely), than just 'visit' the objects in order. * I wasn't sure about why is it necessary to select the entire table in a different way? If the entire table is selected, than selectedTableCells() should do the same. That's why there is no different caret-selection-handling right before the visit. * Other modification is the removed duplicate of cell-protection-check. If only one cell is selected, the loop still can operate, just runs only once. * The patch contains many inline comments to cover all cases clearly. *This patch is just a suggestion to make this snippet more cleaner.* Diffs ----- libs/kotext/KoTextEditor.cpp 392f682 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124641/diff/ Testing ------- Builded successfully, table works the same as before. Thanks, Soma Schliszka
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
