Am Montag, 31. August 2015, 12:19:32 schrieb Cyrille Berger: > On Sunday 30 August 2015 17:30:22 Sven Langkamp wrote: > > We started out offering endless choise for the users and gave them > > everything. But at some point it became clear that in many cases it was > > just overkill. We spend a huge amout of time to fix things like bugs that > > showed up in Krita when a spreadsheet was insert. That's a feature that no > > user ever needed. So over time we dialed back the available shapes until > > we > > have only simple geometry, paths and text. > > The same happend with tools which felt often out of place and Krita, so we > > made tools that wrapped around flake tools. To this day users are confused > > by tools that don't behave like the rest of Krita. > > To be honest, it was/is a problem for office application. The KOffice2 idea > of one UI to fit them all, was a bad idea. We saw that in sheets that had a > weird tool for editing cells, then words started to get a completely > different UI. And I got unhappy with braindump because the tools didn't fit > so well. > > So in this end, a split between model and view in flake would be a good idea > for office applications and krita. and would be needed for developing > mobile UI. And would make it possible for me to provide the correct UI for > braindump.
Yes, split between model and view in flake is one of the things I plan. Or rather a split between model, view and controller, given an idea of recursive MVC pattern as is being developed in my Kasten framework. (That one is currently stuck in a redesign, and waits for ideas being grown e.g. from Calligra design experience ;) ). Cheers Friedrich _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
