On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 09:57:32 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
I think that the frameworks branch is now ready to be called 3.0. It's
obviously not ready to release to end users, but we should make it the
new master. But let's call it the frameworks branch for now.
+1 for making frameworks master now :)
Proposal:
Let's change and not (ab)use the "3.0" version label for the current
development milestone in the frameworks branch where initial port could be
declared done-with-no-big-regressions, and thus also not do the first release
as "3.1".
Let's instead use the "3.0" version for the first release. And simply keep the
current 3.0 Alpha tag on the frameworks branch.
Not need to dump "3.0" in interface to public and waste time/space in the
release notes, chats and interviews/articles on where 3.0 is and why 3.0 was
skipped, where instead features could and should be highlighted :)
Unless anyone can tell if there could be a great promotion spin done out of
that? ;)
Internally we have been talking about 3.0 as switch-feature-development-to-
frameworks milestone and 3.1 as first-qt5-based release, but well, we are
smart contributors and can quickly adapt tag labels, right? :)
Objections?
Not for me, but though I was just using the terminology we'd decided on at the
start of the porting, I don't switching away from it :-)
Boudewijn
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
