----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124036/#review81303 -----------------------------------------------------------
I'd prefer that we don't do any kind of porting like this before 3.2 besides i would prefer no use of namespace and also that we dn't end up with a mix of two different writing frameworks in our code That said the framework in itself looks like a good idea - Camilla Boemann On June 7, 2015, 6:12 p.m., Jos van den Oever wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124036/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 7, 2015, 6:12 p.m.) > > > Review request for Calligra. > > > Repository: calligra > > > Description > ------- > > a bit more porting to writeodf > > > Diffs > ----- > > filters/libodf2/KoColumn.cpp aab928a > libs/odf/Ko3dScene.cpp 81d7c28 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124036/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > no > > > Thanks, > > Jos van den Oever > >
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
