+1
On 23/06/2013, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> I got a comment from Zagge in a review request lately about naming of the
> private class. So I did a little investigation and there is a mix of two
> styles: class Private (i.e. Foo::Private) and class FooPrivate.
>
> here's a short summary of the current state of things:
>
> Foo::Private FooPrivate
> libs/odf 18 classes 6 classes
> libs/flake 50 classes 46 classes
> libs/main 25 classes 17 classes
>
>
> I suggest that we standardize on Foo::Private. This would mean that in the
> .h
> file we will end the class with the following code snippet:
>
> class Foo
> {
> public:
> ...
>
> private:
> class Private:
> Private * const d;
> };
>
>
> Sounds good? If there is agreement I can put this on the wiki where we keep
>
> our coding standards.
>
> -Inge
>
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
>
--
regards / pozdrawiam, Jarosław Staniek
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
