2013/3/25 Sebastian Sauer <m...@dipe.org>: > On 03/25/2013 12:32 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> >> hi, congrats for publicity but i'm suggesting not introducing >> redundant brands extra that sound like a fork, > > > Redundant as in Coffice contains already a C==Calligra? Yes, well. That name > refers also to my preference for coffee & cola while hacking: > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coffice :) Also redundancy is > something rather common in FLOSS. May it be in Calligra's code (just look my > last review-request, but yes, its way better today then it was years ago), > in naming (acronyms, redundancy, jokes - hello libkok :). > > Anyhow. If that's somehow a problem would renaming solve it? And if yes, > what's a better name to show its just another flavor of Calligra just like > Calligra Mobile, Documents on the N9, Calligra Active, Calligra Kids (which > is afaik gone but well, we once had plans there with a specialized > interface), ... > > >> just writing >> 'experimental calligra words for android' would imho say it clearly >> what's the effort is about atm... > > > hmmm... Ok, I changed the description from "alpha-version" to "experimental > alpha-version". Now it says "Experimental alpha version with support for > Words only, more to come later" or so. > > FYI: In fact all that started with Sheets and I have a compiling and linking > Sheets already. The reasons why I switched to Words are that a) Sheets makes > way lesser use of calligralibs and getting calligralibs working and proper > tested was very important cause b) Words and Stage share quit a lot of > code/logic and so having Words done its a small(er) step to Stage. The thing > is that I like to first focus on the foundations, that means get Words > proper threaded, before adding more and more to the mix. That's what I will > work on next. > > For the "for Android" part: That's what I wrote and what most news-articles > took over even in there headlines, no? Anyhow, its also clear that that > isn't 100% true cause I actually did/do most of the work on my KDE desktop, > where the app runs and works fine too, and only test on the device from time > to time or for things like multi-touch where desktop isn't that good. > Probably would make sense I add it to OBS so there are packages for desktop > Linux. Will look at it. Also its clear that BB10 and Sailfish are very much > on top of my list. Anyhow, I think the interesting news here for now is > indeed the "runs on Android and heer are the packages" part and that's what > most news-articles took over. imho a good message.
Since you seem to be trying to cut down on size, perhaps Calligra Mini? :) Elvis > > >> That's my first impression after >> reading mislesding info on newssites... > > > Not sure what's misleading or how I could address that. Its now > "experimental Words only" (more coming later)" what imho sums it good up. > > >> >> On 25/03/2013, Sebastian Sauer <m...@dipe.org> wrote: >>> >>> Common feedback seems to be that the application should contain the >>> "Calligra" name to raise awareness / make our brand stronger. I tend to >>> agree. Suggestion would be that to rename the visible parts to "Calligra >>> Coffice". Would that be okay or anybody against or...? >>> >>> Also the name "Coffice" is for sure not set in stones but I can't think >>> of a better one. If there are suggestions raise please raise them now! :) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> calligra-devel mailing list >>> calligra-devel@kde.org >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
