On 2013-01-11 09:53, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 11 January 2013 09:34, Cyrille Berger <cber...@cberger.net> wrote:
Hi,
Since Casper discovered some really bad bugs in calligra sheets,
even though
they are not regressions, it still might be worth to have an extra
"RC" to
make sure that fixing those bugs don't introduce regressions.
Is the regression in some new feature or in core changes?
I am asking because personally if there's regression that's
unsolvable
on time I am leaning towards moving the change to version+1.
I feel we're seriously delayed (~2 months) and thus breaking our
commitments to release often.
They are not regressions, but are rather severe bugs in the calculation
engine of sheets:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313010
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312981
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313056
Actually this keeps bugfixes unreleased for a long time. May I to ask
for another minor release for 2.5 in the meantime?
I am fine with that.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
