On Monday 12 November 2012 Nov, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > The xml id regeneration does spoil the diffs. But I think that Calligra > > formats the XML nicely enough that a line based VCS is still usable. And I > > also don't think that it will make the diffs unreadable and hide the real > > content changes. > > In the long run we need to make sure the xml ids are consistent anyway (like > Jos said), so that was just an argument for now. > Though looking at diffs on the text-file level is not what we should optimize > for, or? Still nice to have, I agree, if only for as-small-diffs-as-possible.
Actually, regenerating the xml-id's on saving was a conscious decision back then... One that has cost us a lot of effort in implementation work, actually. I don't totally remember the arguments for regeneration, just that I have spent hours and hours when working on RDF to make it work. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
