On Friday 13 July 2012 Jul, C. Boemann wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2012 08:45:13 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Friday 13 Jul 2012, you wrote: > > > Flexibility is a +1, but one -1 (besides adding further complexity to > > > cmake files) is that these build profiles should only be used for > > > custom builds. We don't want stripped-down Word in the popular > > > distros, for example, not being able to handle the Biblio feature. > > > > You really don't have to worry about distributions, packagers will package > > with every optional dependency as possible, and as long as they are listed > > at the end of the configuration step, they will notice them and include > > them. This is why we often get the complain that Calligra installation is > > bloated. Personnaly, I think it is ok. > > > > However I thought we were in agreement that we wanted to make it possible > > to create very lightweight custom build of calligra with as few > > dependencies as possible. > > > > In any case, new hard dependencies need to be discussed and announced on > > the mailing list in advance. > uhm there was a review request for about a week
Yeah, I saw that request. But that's not the same same as writing a mail to the mailing list announcing extra dependencies. I saw the request, but I was blindsided by it as well. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
