On Saturday 25 February 2012 13:32:34 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2012, 23:22:46 schrieb ja...@gmx.net: > > On Thursday 23 February 2012 15:37:59 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > IIRC the official name of Karbon14 is now (Calligra) Karbon. But in the > > > sources (including the .desktop files) the name is still Karbon14. > > > Something inside me wants to fix this :) > > > > > > Okay if I provide a patch to change the name from "Karbon14" to "Karbon" > > > in > > > all places left? > > > > Yeah I think nobody is calling it Karbon14, it is too bothersome to call > > it > > like that. However I am not sure about it, but I think the name was chosen > > to avoid any legal/trademark issues which might come up (i.e. not to > > repeat > > history as with the KIllustrator name). > > So to sum it up, i would prefer dropping the 14 and just call it Karbon > > (which we all do already), provided nobody thinks we might get into any > > legal trouble. > > So that potential trouble is actually why no real decision has happened I > guess? Hm. The only thing I saw whose name is close was some API set, but > that seems not a registered trademark and at least I do not see a risk for > user confusion (thus legal rights for the first user of the name group), as > the fields are quite different. But IANAL and do not know what actually > strange rights are applied in whatever countries (e.g. having software > still as one single group of products).
Well there was no pending decision waiting to be taken before you brought up the topic. But it might be a good idea to do that before our release I suppose. So lets make it official and written down what was done in practice anyway: drop the 14 from the name. > > Then, calligra.org already says "Karbon", so that trouble is risked already. > > So jump or stay where you are. Having just one leg in the water is enough > for biting fish anyway ;) > > > > PS: Have I already told how awesome I find Karbon? So far whatever I > > > created as ODG file was nicely displayed, as expected! Only now I might > > > have found the first bug (x y attributes in tspan ignored, but have to > > > check this). > > > > Thanks for you kind words, it is highly appreciated! > > Regarding the bug, that refers to the svg:tspan child element from > > svg:text, right? It should support the x and y attributes, but I am sure > > there are still issues with that, so might be a real bug. > > The attributes are read in the code, but something in the processing might > not work. You can see an error yourself easily: add an artistic text shape, > enter text with a linebreak, save the file and reload. The second line will > now be placed somewhere different. Indeed, it used to work though if i remember correctly. > > Will file a bug about that, so it is not forgotten. Great, thanks. Ciao Jan _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
