> On Feb. 18, 2012, 9:07 a.m., C. Boemann wrote: > > libs/kotext/styles/KoListLevelProperties.cpp, line 822 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104012/diff/1/?file=50364#file50364line822> > > > > not your fault but seriously wondering why we are not using > > KoOdfNumberDefinition here
yes true but what should i do here ? > On Feb. 18, 2012, 9:07 a.m., C. Boemann wrote: > > libs/odf/KoOdfNumberDefinition.h, line 91 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104012/diff/1/?file=50365#file50365line91> > > > > this should go yes of course :) - mojtaba ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104012/#review10707 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 18, 2012, 7:11 a.m., mojtaba shahi wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104012/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 18, 2012, 7:11 a.m.) > > > Review request for Calligra. > > > Description > ------- > > Support from other styles numbering in calligra. > > > Diffs > ----- > > libs/kotext/styles/KoListLevelProperties.cpp c704910 > libs/odf/KoOdfNumberDefinition.h 5ba5da8 > libs/odf/KoOdfNumberDefinition.cpp aff9911 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104012/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > mojtaba shahi > >
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
