On Sunday 11 September 2011 Sep, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 10 September 2011 15:05, Boudewijn Rempt <b...@valdyas.org> wrote: > > On Sunday 04 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The beta is coming soon (not yet tagged), but I would like to start > >> gathering > >> the features (or super major bug fix) list, so that we don't rush this :) > > > > For Krita, we had about 1400 commits during the 2.4 development lifecycle > > which took about eight months (actual count is a bit difficult to do, this > > is krita + pigment + colorengines). This excludes the commits made in the > > feature branch during the 2.3 feature freeze. Of course, there's lots of > > cool work which likely won't be in 2.4, but in a later release, like Matus > > Talcik's opencl filter plugin or Torio Mishi's animation plugin. > > BTW, how do use count commits?
I copy every krita/pigment commit mail into a separate folder, remove the Re: messages and let kmail count :-). It's not scientific, but that's not necessary, since it's just to give a ballpartk figure. > > I am looking at master only and run something like this for Kexi: > > % git shortlog -s -n --since="Dec 12 2010" -e --no-merges kexi > libs/koreport/ libs/koproperty/ plugins/reporting/ > > (notice use of --no-merges) > > And how to find the date is interesting question since work happens in > feature branches in parallel even before tagging previous major > release. > I didn't count those this time. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
