On Tuesday 16 August 2011 Aug, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Monday 15 August 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > > > For the default values, I was thinking of just the add shapes docker, > > > where it should be possible to add/remove default shapes and to edit the > > > properties of the shapes that are in that docker. > > > > ok if this is the limit then i don't see any problem with such a project > > description > What about broadening it a bit to "how to insert shapes ?". That would cover > the defaults, how to make custom shapes and the distinction between tools and > the add shape docker. > > I feel that just the "default" is a bit small for the project, and since we > have identified more problems related to that, we could solve all of them > together.
When I look at what the students produced last year, I was afraid that it would actually be too much... There are so much sides to doing a proper interaction design for the whole problem of inserting shapes. Just from the top of my head: * organizing, tagging, adding and deleting default shapes in the shape selector * dragging, drag+resizing, creating with a tool, creating from the menu * defaults for all the ways of creating shapes On the other hand, a study done in isolation for just setting defaults might not be that useful. Maybe it's possible for two students to collaborate? I'm willing to help mentoring them, of course -- and to make sure we don't get the usual usability study where one or two sample tasks are executed and described. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
