-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102097/#review5132
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Fine with me, and no I don't think we need to do any further tests

- Casper


On July 27, 2011, 2:04 p.m., Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102097/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 27, 2011, 2:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Calligra and Casper Boemann.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Attached patch fixes the case that in KoTextLayoutArea.cpp we could end in an 
> infinite loop by trying to restart layouting the same line from text-position 
> 0 again and again if at position 0 we had a soft-page-break and if the line 
> itself had a textLength of zero (means the soft-page-break was the only 
> character at the line).
> 
> The problem is that in the previous code we did;
> 
>     line = layout->createLine();
>     cursor->lineTextStart = line.isValid() ? line.textStart() : 0;
>     if (softBreak) {
>         return false;
>     }
> 
> what resulted in us trying to continue layouting the same line with 
> soft-page-break again and again from position 0 The patch changes that to
> 
>     line = layout->createLine();
>     if (!line.isValid()) {
>         break;
>     }
>     cursor->lineTextStart = line.textStart();
>     if (softBreak) {
>         return false;
>     }
> 
> Now the question is if its save to assume that if we cannot create one more 
> line then we are done (with that block)? Is that true or would it be better 
> to add a condition somewhere that checks if cursor->lineTextStart < 
> line.textStart() + line.textLength() (e.g. in restartLayout)?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   libs/textlayout/KoTextLayoutArea.cpp 05bf300 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102097/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sebastian
> 
>

_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Reply via email to