On Friday 15 July 2011 12:30:01 Sebastian Sauer wrote: > Aloha, > > yesterday at the ODF plugfest 2011 ( > http://www.opendocsociety.org/news/2011- berlin-plugfest/ ) we had two > interoperability tests and failed on both of them. It seems both where > working at some point but cause of regressions didn't any longer at the > event. That is a problem. > > Let me add that the problem are NOT the regressions. That can happen. The > problem is that we did not discover them for more then a month till that > event. > > So, the question is how to improve that situation to make sure we are able > to discover regressions faster? > > I see two ways; > 1. unittests also for saving. > 2. cstester roundtrips. > > The first would be optimal but it would need *lot* of time especially if we > try to get a good coverage done. > > The second is the fastest way (I can think of atm). We could first fix > cstester so document-roundtrips are proper working and second move that to > a server that runs cstester against the large collection of documents > located on the KDE-svn server in the kofficetests directory. Maybe we can > run that once a day in an automated way and then incoperate that into our > IRC unittest-bot? Or maybe we can provide a webpage that shows in which > ways what documents changed from one day to the other? > > What do you think? Is there maybe a better way? Maybe even an easier way? > Or....?
Hi Really bad news indeed. What kind of regressions are we looking at ? Is it "global" regressions, affecting for instance the whole document content, or just "macro" regressions like a property not being saved properly anymore ? IMHO, both should be covered by different unit tests for better efficiency...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
